Search for: "OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 10:29 am
Gurgaon-based consumer electronics manufacturer Micromax Informatics Ltd secured a temporary injunction from the Delhi high court against rival Chinese phone maker Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 am
Supreme People's Court of the Peoples' Republic of ChinaAuthor ONUnicorn Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia Common Jane LambertPatents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd and others (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat) (4 Nov 2021)This was an application to HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the Patents Court to set aside service of [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
Great Hall of the People ChongqingAuthor flyerletian Licence CCO 1.0 Soutce Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Peter Jackson, Arnold and Phillips) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 947 (11 July 2022)This was an appeal from the judgment of HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the High Court in Nokia [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:44 am
Author Dori Public Domain Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Mitsubishi Electric Corporation v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1048 (Pat) (26 April 2021)This was a trial to determine whether European patent (UK) 1925142B1 is essential to version 10.0.0 and all subsequent versions of TS36.322 of the 4th generation 3GPP Long-Term [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:04 pm
Xiaomi Tech Park, BeijingAuthor Plerxemo Licence CC BY-SA 3,0 Source WikimediaJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1541 (Pat) (8 June 2021)Sometimes a procedural application can lead to a debate on fundamental principles of substantive law. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:01 am
Author Raysonho Licence CC 1,0 Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others (FRAND CMC Judgment) [2021] EWHC 493 (Pat) (4 March 2021)This was an application for an order under Part 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules requiring the 9th to 12th defendants ("the Xiaomi defendants") to answer the claimants; [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
In In re: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
The court found that an infringing implementer that does not commit to a court-determined licence is not permanently prevented from relying on the patentee’s ETSI undertaking nor are they subject to an unqualified injunction. 5) Hotel California Vegetables In the case of Nokia Technologies OY v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 947 Arnold LJ dismissed OPPO’s appeal and refused to stay the English… [read post]
